25 Aria Isle Dr · Lot 4 · The Woodlands, TX Foundation Decision · REV 2 + Keystone · 2026-06-23
The Decision · Foundation Plan · Concrete · Helical Piles UPDATED 06/23/2026 · REV 2 · KEYSTONE · CANTSINK

The plan: REV 2.
The builder: Keystone.

The decisions are made: build the REV 2 (void-box) foundation Dunaway's engineer calls superior, with Keystone Concrete Placement (Stewart Builders) placing the concrete and Cantsink installing the helical piles. This page is the working file — why, the numbers, who's who, what to do next, and the questions to answer before signing.

Foundation planREV 2 — slab on void box + helical piles · issued for construction
ConcreteKeystone (Stewart Builders, Inc.) · Scott Lowe
Helical pilesCantsink · 150 piles · $86,700 (in Keystone's number)
Keystone REV 2$299,483 incl. piles + open scope (see §02)
01 — The plan

REV 2 — the engineer's call.

Asked directly which revision to use, Dunaway's engineer of record said both are sound — but REV 2 is the superior foundation system. We're building to his recommendation.

"Per our phone conversation, both the Rev 2 and Rev 3 helical options are structurally sound. However, from an engineering standpoint, Rev 2 is the superior foundation system."
Juan M. Gonzalez, PE · Senior Project Engineer, Dunaway · email to Murat Ozevin, 06/22/2026 (replying to "if we have two options, which one would you go with?")
DecisionBuild
REV 2
Void box + helicals
Engineer-recommended

Why the void box is the stronger system here. The house sits on helical piles either way. The difference is what's directly under the slab on this expansive-clay lot. In REV 2 the structural slab and grade beams are suspended over a void (collapsible carton forms): when the Houston clay swells, it expands up into that empty space instead of pushing on the foundation. Nothing about the structure's performance depends on imported fill or how well it was compacted.

That's why the engineer calls it superior — the most robust, fully-isolated approach to expansive soil. REV 3's select-fill pad is cheaper and faster, but its performance leans on fill quality and compaction. For a home you can't redo, paying a modest premium for maximum heave protection — on the engineer's recommendation — is the right trade.

Good news on the paperwork — Murat is right

We re-checked the REV 2 PDF title blocks: the REV 2 set is already an "Issued for Construction" set. Its revision ladder reads … Rev 0 = HOA Permit Set (the only line marked "not for construction"), then Rev 1 (04/06/2026) = "Issued for Construction," then Rev 2 = "Revised per client comments." So the "not for construction" wording you may have seen is just the older permit-set line in the history — not the current status. You are not waiting on an IFC release. The only thing to confirm with Dunaway is that REV 2 (not REV 3) is the governing set to build, since he later issued REV 3 as an option — see the next steps.

The one difference, in plain terms. Same piles, same grade beams, same engineer in both revisions. Only the under-slab system changes:

✓ Chosen
REV 2 · 06/04/2026 — building this

Structural slab on a void box

  • Foundation Parameters: "Structural Slab on Void Box w/ Helical Piles."
  • Slab & grade beams cast over 6″ carton/void forms — clay swells up into the void, never loading the house.
  • Heavier slab steel — #5 @ 16″ each way; ~6″ structural slab.
  • Performance does not depend on imported fill or compaction QC.
  • The most robust isolation from expansive-clay heave — the engineer's pick.
Not chosen
REV 3 · 06/15/2026 — the alternative

Slab on a select-fill pad

  • Clay excavated, replaced with a compacted select-fill pad; slab bears on the pad.
  • Lighter slab steel — #4 @ 16″; ~4″ slab.
  • Cheaper & faster, no carton forms — but performance leans on fill quality + 95% compaction.
  • Structurally sound per the engineer, but not superior.
  • Covered in depth on the REV 3 Plans tab →
02 — The numbers

Keystone's price, taken apart.

Keystone's $299,483 already contains the Cantsink helical piles. Once you split it, two things become clear: the piles are a fixed pass-through, and the real all-in is still missing three excluded items.

✓ Selected · REV 2
Keystone Concrete Placement

REV 2 — what the $299,483 is made of

Stewart Builders, Inc. · concrete placement (Cantsink piles included)
Cantsink helical piles — pass-through sub (150 piles)$86,700
Keystone concrete scope — slab, void forms u/slab, grade beams, etc.≈ $212,783
Keystone REV 2 base (as quoted)$299,483
+ Void boxes under grade beamsexcluded (but the REV 2 detail requires them)to add
+ Site work / subgrade prep — excludedto add
+ Spoil / debris haul-off — excludedto add
True all-in = $299,483 plus the three excluded items. Keystone bills monthly in arrears — no large owner deposit.
The number isn't final yet

$299,483 is concrete + piles only. Keystone's proposal explicitly excludes void boxes under grade beams — yet the REV 2 structural detail requires grade beams cast on carton void boxes — plus all site work and spoil haul-off. Those have to be priced in before $299,483 is a real all-in. (Murat's table once showed Keystone at $312,753 using KGW's $13,270 line, but that was the REV 3 select-fill pad scope — REV 2 has no pad, so the REV 2 site-work number still needs its own quote.) Action: get Keystone to re-issue a single, gap-free REV 2 number.

The piles: Cantsink, $86,700

Both bidders priced the exact same Cantsink proposal (06/16/2026), so the piles aren't a variable — they're a fixed $86,700 pass-through inside whoever pours the concrete. Here's what that buys:

Pile type
Qty × unit
Subtotal
What it is
30 KIP piles
106 × $578
$61,268
Single 2.5″ galvanized pipe pile
50 KIP points
44 × $578
$25,432
Battered pair — two 2.5″ sch-40 piles, 25 KIP each
Total
150 units
$86,700
= the early/“deposit” line in both bids
Depth
Bid to 17 ft
+$28/ft
Beyond 17 ft — the main overrun risk
By others
Formboards + staking
Keystone does layout; sequence: footings → piles → rebar
Credentials
ICC-ES ESR-1559
since 1988
Code-listed national helical manufacturer (Lilburn, GA)
Cantsink is Keystone's sub — so the PE docs come through Keystone

Murat's read: Keystone will contract Cantsink directly, which means you may not be able to pull Cantsink's PE/sealed design or talk to them directly. So don't rely on a direct line — make the documentation a contract deliverable from Keystone: require Keystone to furnish Cantsink's sealed/PE-stamped pile design (per ESR-1559), torque logs, pile-installation reports, and closeout package. Also nail down in writing who absorbs the $28/ft charge if piles must go past 17 ft, and that Cantsink gets the engineer's geotech report it requires.

Why KeystoneDepth +
terms
Verifiable firm,
arrears billing

The case, in one breath. On a foundation you can't redo, you want a counterparty you can verify and terms that keep your leverage. Keystone is the trade name of Stewart Builders, Inc. — a 33-year-old, ENR-ranked firm (~$682M regional) that owns its own pump fleet — and it bills monthly in arrears with no large deposit.

The conditions that come with it. Contract the legal entity "Stewart Builders, Inc." Close the REV 2 scope gaps above. Get references on comparable new-construction custom-home helical foundations specifically — residential is Keystone's secondary line — and note the 2022 OSHA fatality on its record (resolved). All of that is in the next steps and questions below.

03 — Who you're hiring

The team behind the foundation.

Run through public records — Texas SOS/Comptroller, BBB, OSHA, ENR, ICC-ES — and independently fact-checked. Three firms: the concrete builder, the pile sub, and a possible site-work sub.

✓ Your builder
Keystone Concrete Placement
Selected · concrete + foundation
A trade name of Stewart Builders, Inc. (Stewart Holdings). Contract, COI, and lien waivers must name Stewart Builders, Inc. — not "Keystone."
Legitimacy
Legitimate
Reputation
Mixed
Registration
Stewart Builders, Inc. — TX SOS #0800837396, Jersey Village. DBAs: Keystone Concrete Placement, Keystone Structural Concrete LLC.
Established
1992 — ~33 years. Family-owned (Stewart family; Brad Stewart, VP).
Size
Large regional contractor. ~$682M ENR regional revenue (≈#3 in TX), ~1,200+ workforce, owns its own pump fleet & yards, pours 975,000+ CY/yr, 4+ Texas offices.
Reputation
ENR Texas-Louisiana Specialty Contractor of the Year (2016), recurring ENR top-list, AGC National Safety Award; in The Blue Book since 1997. Little homeowner-facing review trail — lean on references.
Aria Isle track record
Scott Lowe says Keystone poured foundations at 46 Aria Isle (John Post Custom Homes) and 54 Aria Isle (Matt Powers Custom Homes), and is currently on 19 Netherfield Way & 74 Mediterra Way (Novi Custom Homes) — all in The Woodlands. Verify these directly.
Watch for
  • OSHA fatality, 09/13/2022 — a worker was crushed at an Austin wastewater-plant project; 6 serious violations, $40,627 penalty (settled, closed 3/2024).
  • Contract the right legal entity (Stewart Builders, Inc.) and pull a live Comptroller Certificate of Account Status before signing.
  • Residential custom homes are its secondary line — get references on jobs like yours (the Aria Isle ones above are a good start).
Bottom line
Credible, capable, low legitimacy risk — and it has poured on your street. Close the scope + reference items below. Contact: Scott Lowe, PM.
Helical sub · via Keystone
Cantsink, LLC
Helical pile installer
The pile sub inside Keystone's number. Likely contracted by Keystone, not you — so its PE docs need to flow to you through the Keystone contract.
Legitimacy
Legitimate
Standing
Code-listed
Who
Cantsink, LLC — 71 First Avenue, Lilburn, GA. National helical pile manufacturer/installer since 1988. Proposal prepared by Brittany Real, 06/16/2026.
Credentials
ICC-ES code-listed — ESR-1559 (evaluated under AC358; product-tested by CTL|Thompson, IAS-accredited, inspected twice yearly). This is a recognized, evaluated helical product, not a generic pile.
Scope & price
$86,700 — 106 piles @ 30 KIP + 44 @ 50 KIP (battered pairs), 2.5″ galvanized, pile caps & waste disposal included. Bid to 17 ft; +$28/ft beyond.
Watch for
  • Required depth is unknown and varies — the $28/ft extension is the real cost risk; pin down who pays it.
  • Cantsink requires the engineer's geotech report and that footings be dug before piles, piles before rebar — coordination items for Keystone.
  • Because it's Keystone's sub, make the sealed PE design + torque logs a Keystone contract deliverable (you may not get them direct).
Bottom line
A legitimate, code-listed national helical brand — a reassuring choice for the deep foundation. The work to do is contractual (document access), not vetting the product.
K.G.W. Corporation
Possible sub · site work & grading
The grading sub Keystone referenced for the REV 3 pad. On REV 2 there's no pad — but you may still use a grading sub for scrape, rough grade, and spoil haul-off.
Legitimacy
Legitimate
Reputation
Sparse
Registration
Confirmed active TX corporation — Comptroller taxpayer #17420684171, SOS #0049484200, chartered 10/24/1979 (~46 yrs), Active. Family-run (Jimmy King, CEO).
Scope
Small grading/earthwork/site-prep firm — right trade for REV 2 site scrape, rough grade, and spoil haul-off. Note: its $13,270 estimate was for the REV 3 select-fill pad — it doesn't apply as-is to REV 2.
Watch for
  • Insurance self-claimed — get a current COI; call the Brickland Homes reference.
  • Poor recent FMCSA truck-inspection record (75% out-of-service) — relevant if KGW hauls spoil off-site.
Bottom line
Legitimate small sub for a defined site-work scope. Re-quote them (or an alternative) for the actual REV 2 site work, not the REV 3 pad — and decide whether Keystone or you carries them.
04 — What to do now

The path to breaking ground.

REV 2 is already a construction set, so you're closer than it looks. The work left is contractual: confirm the set, close Keystone's scope, and lock the documentation.

Confirm REV 2 is the governing construction set.

REV 2 already reads "Issued for Construction" (Rev 1), revised by Rev 2 — no IFC release is pending. Just get Dunaway to confirm in writing that REV 2 (Rev 2, 06/04/2026) governs over REV 3, plus the one-paragraph "REV 2 preferred & why" note for the file/lender. Verify nothing on the County/HOA permit side needs the structural set re-submitted.

→ Dunaway · Juan Gonzalez, PE

Get Keystone's gap-free REV 2 all-in.

Have Keystone re-issue one number that resolves the grade-beam void boxes, site work, and spoil haul-off it currently excludes — so $299,483 becomes a true all-in. Confirm the contract names Stewart Builders, Inc. Their 15-day proposal has lapsed, so a refreshed one is needed anyway.

→ Keystone · Scott Lowe

Make Cantsink's PE documents a Keystone deliverable.

Since Keystone contracts Cantsink, you won't deal with Cantsink directly. Put it in the Keystone contract: Keystone furnishes Cantsink's sealed PE pile design (ESR-1559), torque logs, installation reports, and closeout package — and define who eats the $28/ft overrun if piles exceed 17 ft. Make sure Cantsink receives the geotech report it requires.

→ Keystone (passing through Cantsink)

Line up the REV 2 site-work / grading sub.

REV 2 still needs site scrape, rough grade, and spoil haul-off. Re-quote KGW (or an alternative) for the actual REV 2 scope — not the REV 3 pad — and decide whether Keystone carries it or you contract it directly. Confirm proof-roll/subgrade tolerance before Keystone starts.

→ KGW / grading sub

Collect Keystone's paperwork before signing.

Certificate of insurance (GL + workers' comp, owner as additional insured), references on comparable custom-home helical foundations (confirm the 46 & 54 Aria Isle jobs), written warranty, and a milestone-based payment schedule. Pull a live Comptroller Certificate of Account Status for Stewart Builders, Inc.

→ Keystone

Set up third-party testing & inspection.

The bid excludes testing. Decide who arranges and pays for pile torque/installation verification and concrete cylinders, and confirm Dunaway's construction-observation role. Budget it now so it isn't a surprise change order.

→ Owner + Dunaway + testing lab
05 — Questions to ask

Get these answered in writing.

Grouped by who to ask. The ones that close real gaps in the REV 2 path come first.

ADunaway — the engineerJuan Gonzalez, PE
  • Confirm REV 2 (Rev 2, 06/04/2026) is the governing construction set over REV 3 — and that the REV 2 sheets' "Issued for Construction" designation stands.You're not waiting on an IFC release; you just need it confirmed that REV 2, not the later REV 3, is what gets built.
  • A short written owner-facing note confirming both revs are acceptable, REV 2 is preferred, and why.You have the 6/22 email; a one-paragraph note formalizes it for the file / HOA / lender.
  • Does the latest geotech (Quartet, Add. 2) still support REV 2, or did it push toward REV 3?Murat asked this; Juan said both work — get it in writing for the record.
  • Confirm the governing REV 2 details: the grade-beam void-box requirement (carton forms 2″ less than beam width), slab thickness/reinforcing, and required concrete strength (the bid assumes only 3,000 psi).Settles Keystone's void-box exclusion and whether 3,000 psi is adequate for the grade beams.
  • Long-term maintenance & drainage expectations for the REV 2 system (soil-moisture, ponding, trees, slope-away).The S2.0 warnings put real obligations on the homeowner — know them up front.
BKeystone — scope & termsScott Lowe · Stewart Builders, Inc.
  • Reconcile the REV 2 exclusion of "void boxes under grade beams" against the REV 2 structural detail — who furnishes and installs them, and at what cost?The detail requires them; the proposal excludes them. The biggest open scope gap.
  • Re-issue one gap-free REV 2 all-in stating whether site clearing, subgrade prep, and spoil haul-off are in or out.$299,483 is concrete + piles only; the true all-in is higher.
  • Insurance certificates (GL limits + workers' comp), references for new-construction helical foundations (incl. the 46 & 54 Aria Isle jobs), and written warranty language.Non-negotiable; residential is their secondary line, so references matter.
  • A payment schedule tied to objective milestones — not large deposits or one post-pour invoice.Keystone already bills in arrears; lock the milestones in the contract.
  • Who owns survey layout, form survey, benchmark control, utility locates, and damage to unmarked utilities?The proposal pushes these to the client — confirm and budget them.
  • Weather-delay rules, schedule assumptions, and plumber-handoff timing; and is performance/payment bond pricing available as an option?Defines who eats delays and how the under-slab plumbing inspection sequences in.
  • Contract, COI, and lien waivers issued to "Stewart Builders, Inc.""Keystone" is a trade name, not the contracting legal entity.
CHelical piles — via KeystoneCantsink is Keystone's sub
  • Require Keystone to furnish Cantsink's sealed/PE-stamped pile design (per ESR-1559), torque logs, installation reports, and closeout docs.You likely can't get these from Cantsink directly — make them Keystone contract deliverables.
  • Confirm the pile count and load categories — 106 @ 30 KIP + 44 @ 50 KIP (battered pairs) — and the assumed depths and mobilizations.Reconciles the concrete bids' rough "110 piles" against Cantsink's actual 150 units.
  • Who absorbs the $28/ft charge if piles must exceed 17 ft?Depth required to meet load isn't known until installed — this is the main cost-overrun risk.
  • Confirm Cantsink receives the engineer's geotech report it requires, and confirm sequencing — footings dug before piles, piles before rebar.A Cantsink condition; getting it wrong stalls the pour.
  • Does the price include all embed plates, anchor bolts, hold-downs, base plates, column bolts, and special anchors — furnish and/or install?Keystone "installs embeds supplied by others" — clarify who buys vs. sets each item so nothing falls between trades.
DSite work / gradingKGW or alternative
  • Quote the actual REV 2 site scope (scrape, rough grade, spoil haul-off) — with load counts, unit price beyond any allowance, proof-roll process, and the subgrade tolerance required before Keystone starts.REV 2 has no select-fill pad, so the REV 3 $13,270 estimate doesn't apply — re-scope it.
  • Who is responsible if the subgrade/site prep is rejected by Dunaway, geotech, or the inspector?Defines the liability seam between the grading sub and Keystone.
  • Current COI (GL + workers' comp + auto); and call the named reference.Insurance is self-claimed on KGW's site — verify before any work.